Comment Comment by velodrome No money going towards nuclear....If people were serious about ACTUALLY reducing carbon emissions, then baseload power production would be nuclear.Please look at France as an example.France: 5.0 metric tons per capita (2013)US: 16.4 metric tons per capita (2013)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_di...Nuclear power is the largest source of electricity in the country, with a generation of 416.8 TWh, or 76.3%[2] of the country's total production of 546 TWh, the highest percentage in the world.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France parent velodrome 8 years ago
If people were serious about ACTUALLY reducing carbon emissions, then baseload power production would be nuclear.
Please look at France as an example.
France: 5.0 metric tons per capita (2013)
US: 16.4 metric tons per capita (2013)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_carbon_di...
Nuclear power is the largest source of electricity in the country, with a generation of 416.8 TWh, or 76.3%[2] of the country's total production of 546 TWh, the highest percentage in the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_in_France