> I have no trouble believing that Jobs (and the vast majority at Apple) used the image of counterculture in good faith, even while they changed it into a sort of hollowed-out version streamlined for capitalism.
This is exactly as I understand it too... Except this being a fairly good example of what counterculture circles generally call, a complete sell out.
It's complicated of course, how else does one stay relevant long term without also being extremely wealthy / i.e. the ability to broadcast a message to many many nodes? Put another way. Money talks.
This is exactly as I understand it too... Except this being a fairly good example of what counterculture circles generally call, a complete sell out.
It's complicated of course, how else does one stay relevant long term without also being extremely wealthy / i.e. the ability to broadcast a message to many many nodes? Put another way. Money talks.