It seems self-contradictory to me. How can Intel warrant that
> the Product will substantially conform to Intel’s publicly available specifications
while simultaneously disclaiming warranty for
> design defects or errors in the Product (Errata)
?
If an instruction does something different than what their specs say on occasion, do they take that to mean it's substantially conforming to their specs?
It seems self-contradictory to me. How can Intel warrant that
> the Product will substantially conform to Intel’s publicly available specifications
while simultaneously disclaiming warranty for
> design defects or errors in the Product (Errata)
?
If an instruction does something different than what their specs say on occasion, do they take that to mean it's substantially conforming to their specs?