It's hard to ask this question without sounding snarky, but I hope you will understand that I'm seriously curious to hear what you think.
> No, my observation has nothing to do with composition vs/ inheritance.
> It's about defining what a class IS vs/ what a class HAS.
What do you feel is the difference between these two sentences? In other words, why is inheritance vs composition not the same as what a class is vs what a class has?
> No, my observation has nothing to do with composition vs/ inheritance.
> It's about defining what a class IS vs/ what a class HAS.
What do you feel is the difference between these two sentences? In other words, why is inheritance vs composition not the same as what a class is vs what a class has?