The argument in the article is deeply flawed. It goes like this:
With net neutrality, ISPs would be over-regulated, and competition/ease of market entry would be hampered.
The article then goes on to claim this competition is needed, because Google and Facebook already have so much power over the internet.
But this is deeply flawed, because big compabies will only have more power over the net without net neutrality: they can just pay for the net to behave as they want.
With net neutrality, ISPs would be over-regulated, and competition/ease of market entry would be hampered.
The article then goes on to claim this competition is needed, because Google and Facebook already have so much power over the internet.
But this is deeply flawed, because big compabies will only have more power over the net without net neutrality: they can just pay for the net to behave as they want.