Is it me, or is this whole article failed out of the gate by the fact that you can't prove a negative?
"Prove that x didnt happen" is impossible.
Now, if he said to prove that the earth IS only 10,000 years old, that would be at least something to shoot for, but changes the whole scope of the article...
"Prove that x didnt happen" is impossible.
Now, if he said to prove that the earth IS only 10,000 years old, that would be at least something to shoot for, but changes the whole scope of the article...