If net neutrality was ended, would ISPs actually charge incrementally for website access?
Websites like savetheinternet.com seem to argue that if net neutrality is ended, only major websites will be offered. They say "And without Net Neutrality, millions of small businesses owned by people of color wouldn’t be able to compete against larger corporations online, which would deepen economic disparities."
Why are ISPs going to targets people of color? I don't understand..
How will ISPs decide what websites I can not visit? Will they have a whitelist/blacklist?
Will there be ISPs that offer packages that we have now? (I.E bandwidth only restriction)
I've seen good arguments both for and against net neutrality and I really don't know which would be better.
Websites like savetheinternet.com seem to argue that if net neutrality is ended, only major websites will be offered. They say "And without Net Neutrality, millions of small businesses owned by people of color wouldn’t be able to compete against larger corporations online, which would deepen economic disparities."
Why are ISPs going to targets people of color? I don't understand..
How will ISPs decide what websites I can not visit? Will they have a whitelist/blacklist?
Will there be ISPs that offer packages that we have now? (I.E bandwidth only restriction)
I've seen good arguments both for and against net neutrality and I really don't know which would be better.