>No, you're wrong and you've completely missed my point.
Nope, I got your point, you're just repeating a naive view of the world because you yourself have never faced hardship. This is the same kind of comment I see from well-off libertarians who wonder why the poor can't just move elsewhere.
If you can't see why losing everything and having nothing left to survive can make people despondent, you're not capable of having a discussion about people.
Nope, I got your point, you're just repeating a naive view of the world because you yourself have never faced hardship. This is the same kind of comment I see from well-off libertarians who wonder why the poor can't just move elsewhere.
If you can't see why losing everything and having nothing left to survive can make people despondent, you're not capable of having a discussion about people.