I still wonder how it's possible to start developing replacement for something as entangled in Unix culture as X, then just say "yeah, we're not going to do the killer feature of it" and have community go on with it.
If the point of Wayland is to replace "unmaintainable mess" that X supposedly is, they should show how to provide better protocol for X features, instead of cutting them off and claiming they solved something.
If the point of Wayland is to replace "unmaintainable mess" that X supposedly is, they should show how to provide better protocol for X features, instead of cutting them off and claiming they solved something.