This also means "Twitter could be eclipsed by Square in value".
I'm sure they debated hard whether to go for this headline or the other one, and decided to go with "Square could pass twitter in value" because it would generate more page view.
My point is, it's Twitter that's doing bad. I don't understand why he doesn't just give up his CEO role and let someone else more dedicated take over.
It may make sense if the problem Twitter is facing can be solved by some creative vision, but it can't. These problems are ones that require a lot of care and effort and no matter how he spins it, he's pouring half the effort he can pour into Twitter.
I'm sure they debated hard whether to go for this headline or the other one, and decided to go with "Square could pass twitter in value" because it would generate more page view.
My point is, it's Twitter that's doing bad. I don't understand why he doesn't just give up his CEO role and let someone else more dedicated take over.
It may make sense if the problem Twitter is facing can be solved by some creative vision, but it can't. These problems are ones that require a lot of care and effort and no matter how he spins it, he's pouring half the effort he can pour into Twitter.