So, in other words, the law is wrong. And the is kept as such for purposes of revenue enhancement (illegal taxation)?
I can see a few interesting govt things coming out of "Autos":
1. Revenue from bad laws drops to 0. These vehicles follow the letter of the law. And they have the logs to prove any sort of claim against the former.
2. A false claim is filed (BLM makes about a point about this..) and says driver did X. Is this the person's responsibility, or the company who wrote the AI?
I can see a few interesting govt things coming out of "Autos":
1. Revenue from bad laws drops to 0. These vehicles follow the letter of the law. And they have the logs to prove any sort of claim against the former.
2. A false claim is filed (BLM makes about a point about this..) and says driver did X. Is this the person's responsibility, or the company who wrote the AI?