Please tell me you're joking, snakeanus. There is no way you could seriously be trying to make out paedo's as the victim here?
> I fail to see how arresting people for a thoughtcrime is heroic.
Thoughtcrime? No, viewing or possessing CP is an actual crime.
> How can someone who has never raped a child but just views CP on an online forum be a "motherfucking-sickshitbag-fucker"? Who was the victim of this person?
Quite obviously, the child/children in the pictures they're viewing.
> Why do you feel the need to insult people who haven't done anything wrong?
They have done something that isn't just illegal, but unquestionably morally reprehensible. How could that ever be considered 'not wrong'?
> How do you exactly "protect children from harms" by catching people that simply view CP?
What are you asking here? How do you protect children from paedophiles by arresting paedophiles?
> I fail to see how arresting people for a thoughtcrime is heroic.
Thoughtcrime? No, viewing or possessing CP is an actual crime.
> How can someone who has never raped a child but just views CP on an online forum be a "motherfucking-sickshitbag-fucker"? Who was the victim of this person?
Quite obviously, the child/children in the pictures they're viewing.
> Why do you feel the need to insult people who haven't done anything wrong?
They have done something that isn't just illegal, but unquestionably morally reprehensible. How could that ever be considered 'not wrong'?
> How do you exactly "protect children from harms" by catching people that simply view CP?
What are you asking here? How do you protect children from paedophiles by arresting paedophiles?