#2 is definitely wrong. We aren't a collection of similar hacks; we are qualitatively different because we include the ability to gain new heuristics and to cross apply the ones we already have. No clever library of strung together hacks will have these 2 properties. In the same way, an ant hill is not just a bunch of ants, it has so many emergent properties that thinking of it in terms of its components is a mistake
We should however think more expansively about intelligence than just the sort humans have. The goal doesn't need to be straight mimicry of humans
We should however think more expansively about intelligence than just the sort humans have. The goal doesn't need to be straight mimicry of humans