> No. It is in an attempt to resolve the real loss of money...
Naked apologism. So unthoughtful, and delivered with such a righteous tone.
If this was their intention, they could have implemented the feature honestly, informing users about what was happening, and offering a clear choice, such as an immediate popup, between "turn off for this location" and "turn off completely." That would have been fine.
But the existence of this "pro" to the deceptive and confusing behavior does not justify it.
Naked apologism. So unthoughtful, and delivered with such a righteous tone.
If this was their intention, they could have implemented the feature honestly, informing users about what was happening, and offering a clear choice, such as an immediate popup, between "turn off for this location" and "turn off completely." That would have been fine.
But the existence of this "pro" to the deceptive and confusing behavior does not justify it.