> your position is the same as I stated but you have rationale behind it. I get that.
But it is not. Which I just explained why. The difference is that the things I complain about is specific examples with data to back it up. The author and other people similar just throw out random shit that is as provable as a religious experience.
> it's speaking to others like me who already know our work environment sucks
Great attitude there buddy.
> think these are claims that need evidence
I provided evidence for the examples I brought up, the rest is just as the authors anecdotal with no evidence. This is my whole point.
> I can only assume you're somehow threatened but I struggle to see how. men feeling threatened by women talking about their spaces is very strange
Why do people always resort to this jargon? I am not "threatened" I just do not like discrimination based on gender and I believe that is happening more towards men than women in tech today. It is happening in the name of diversity and equality.
But it is not. Which I just explained why. The difference is that the things I complain about is specific examples with data to back it up. The author and other people similar just throw out random shit that is as provable as a religious experience.
> it's speaking to others like me who already know our work environment sucks
Great attitude there buddy.
> think these are claims that need evidence
I provided evidence for the examples I brought up, the rest is just as the authors anecdotal with no evidence. This is my whole point.
> I can only assume you're somehow threatened but I struggle to see how. men feeling threatened by women talking about their spaces is very strange
Why do people always resort to this jargon? I am not "threatened" I just do not like discrimination based on gender and I believe that is happening more towards men than women in tech today. It is happening in the name of diversity and equality.