Wow, this article is a pretty egregious misinterpretation of those points. I didn't come away with anything even vaguely resembling what you just said, even if we disregard the factual errors.
Candidly, your comments here make a lot more sense than some "We haven't yet built the DynaBook the way we should" piece.
Candidly, your comments here make a lot more sense than some "We haven't yet built the DynaBook the way we should" piece.