Comment by jhg

Hmm, OK. Try a different example - the compiler should allow the following code without any warnings:

  void foo(int * a) { }

  void bar(int * b) { foo(b); }

  void baz(const int * c) { bar(c); }

Point being is that the compiler should warn of the const violation based on whether a function argument or a class member is getting touched in the function code.

In fact, the example above is more relevant, because what I am ultimately aiming for is to not need to make member functions const, and yet be able to call them for const class instances.