> Majority rule based on one-person-one-vote notoriously results in tyranny of the majority–a large number of people who care only a little about an outcome prevail over a minority that cares passionately, resulting in a reduction of aggregate welfare.
Calling the majority tyrannous and assuming fringe interests to be naturally benevolent reeks of an agenda.
Calling the majority tyrannous and assuming fringe interests to be naturally benevolent reeks of an agenda.