>I think the situation would improve with better teaching of philosophy of science and statistics (this would educate better reviewers too).
This is necessary, but not sufficient. What's needed is a way to know for sure that the hypothesis was not changed after data collection. I think predeclaring the hypothesis is the way to go.
This is necessary, but not sufficient. What's needed is a way to know for sure that the hypothesis was not changed after data collection. I think predeclaring the hypothesis is the way to go.