When they ask if an update to a stable compiler has broken their code, what does this mean exactly? I had thought that a goal of Rust was to always maintain backwards compatibility?
I know how hard this is to pull off and I am not trying to say they have done a poor job; I genuinely want to know what others consider a breaking change.
I know how hard this is to pull off and I am not trying to say they have done a poor job; I genuinely want to know what others consider a breaking change.