The memo was making the point that because men have more affinity to things than women, Google should not try for a 50/50 balance between men and women.
The author here says that she enjoyed her work but left because the predominant male co-workers had affinity to things and couldn't relate with them.
If anything the author makes a case for Google's current strategy of striving for 50/50 men women balance, since that would result in the author being able to relate better with the co-workers.
The solution to author's problem is more targeted diversity.
The author here says that she enjoyed her work but left because the predominant male co-workers had affinity to things and couldn't relate with them.
If anything the author makes a case for Google's current strategy of striving for 50/50 men women balance, since that would result in the author being able to relate better with the co-workers.
The solution to author's problem is more targeted diversity.
Did I mis-interpret something?