Am I the only one who sees a major difference between publishing a negative story about someone and publishing an illegaly-obtained sex tape in its entirety, and refusing to take it down after a judge orders to do so?
I get the concern that blowback a could happen, but Gawker died because of Gawker, not just because some rich guy went after them.
I get the concern that blowback a could happen, but Gawker died because of Gawker, not just because some rich guy went after them.