No, this is not that. The "tu quoque" logical fallacy follows this pattern (from Wikipedia):
Person A makes claim X.
Person B asserts that A's actions or past claims are inconsistent with the truth of claim X.
Therefore X is false.[2]
They are not saying their claim is false. They're saying that if they care so much, why are they subjecting their users to tracking that they are unable to opt out of?
No, this is not that. The "tu quoque" logical fallacy follows this pattern (from Wikipedia):
They are not saying their claim is false. They're saying that if they care so much, why are they subjecting their users to tracking that they are unable to opt out of?