Comment Comment by nwjtkjn Good point, though I'm not convinced Hilbert really avoids this. For example, look at n=3 here:http://www.texample.net/media/tikz/examples/PNG/hilbert-curv...This might lead to say. . . . . . . .1 . . . . . . 24 . . . . . . 3. . . . . . . .when. . . . . . . .1 . . . . . . 42 . . . . . . 3. . . . . . . .is more efficient.Generally speaking, it seems this is basically TSP. parent nwjtkjn 9 years ago
http://www.texample.net/media/tikz/examples/PNG/hilbert-curv...
This might lead to say
. . . . . . . .
1 . . . . . . 2
4 . . . . . . 3
. . . . . . . .
when
. . . . . . . .
1 . . . . . . 4
2 . . . . . . 3
. . . . . . . .
is more efficient.
Generally speaking, it seems this is basically TSP.