> Do you really want an init system that replaces a ton of functionality poorly like dns, ntp, syslog, xinetd, etc etc etc?
SystemD is not just an "init" system. You have to look at the larger vision for it being a set of building blocks for Linux system and service management.
I think this is a very good thing. Its about time that Linux had a unified and self-consistent approach to system management and configuration.
SystemD is not just an "init" system. You have to look at the larger vision for it being a set of building blocks for Linux system and service management.
I think this is a very good thing. Its about time that Linux had a unified and self-consistent approach to system management and configuration.