No. The Charlie Gard case is an horrific example of how easily grief and desperation are exploited with false hope.
Your corruption of the facts - the UK's government has not "decided he should die" - is an echo of that exploitation.
It is the same construct that leads the unwell to adopt dangerous or ineffective remedies from quacks and snake oil merchants, only in this case it is being leveraged by political and religious groups to further their own agenda.
Your corruption of the facts - the UK's government has not "decided he should die" - is an echo of that exploitation.
It is the same construct that leads the unwell to adopt dangerous or ineffective remedies from quacks and snake oil merchants, only in this case it is being leveraged by political and religious groups to further their own agenda.