I'm not making a claim, I argue based on what we already know. Penrose is the one claiming something here.
> Do you think Penrose disagrees that the Human mind is bound by physical laws??
Yes. Having read his work in the past, I know that he disagrees the human mind is bound by physical laws. This is the whole reason behind the argument they're putting forth to begin with: they postulate that humans are capable of making an inference that could not possibly be made by a machine intelligence.
However, it has never been shown that we are not a machine intelligence.
> Do you think Penrose disagrees that the Human mind is bound by physical laws??
Yes. Having read his work in the past, I know that he disagrees the human mind is bound by physical laws. This is the whole reason behind the argument they're putting forth to begin with: they postulate that humans are capable of making an inference that could not possibly be made by a machine intelligence.
However, it has never been shown that we are not a machine intelligence.