Your assumptions mean nothing,unless you produce quantifiable data and verifiable data source to proof any of your claims.
Your statement combining the words, hyper, troll, government, modi, sanity, are not backed up by any data nor they hold true for anyone else expect the ones having a biased brain such, as yours.
I can prove point by point how communists spread fake news.
Your assumptions about equating disagreeing with fake news with stamping as fake news, does not matter, it actually makes you a troll who just wants to spread the propaganda; that a person stating a media house as a fake news source necessarily disagrees with it, if he/she has an opinion at all about the fake news.
How in earth did you just assume that fake news = disagreement by the person who finds out the fake factor in the news.
A news is fake, means, it has not got verifiable data to back up it's headline or summary.
Simple and plain.
Why is it so hard for some people to understand?
I would rather communicate with those who don't label people and jump to conclusions.
Good day, and Remember,
Fake News =
No verifiable data source
+
no quantifiable data.
Fake News Defender's arguments
=
oppose all those who find out the fake factor/fact check by abusing them and name calling them trolls "look he disagrees hence he calls it fake news".
Your statement combining the words, hyper, troll, government, modi, sanity, are not backed up by any data nor they hold true for anyone else expect the ones having a biased brain such, as yours.
I can prove point by point how communists spread fake news.
Your assumptions about equating disagreeing with fake news with stamping as fake news, does not matter, it actually makes you a troll who just wants to spread the propaganda; that a person stating a media house as a fake news source necessarily disagrees with it, if he/she has an opinion at all about the fake news.
How in earth did you just assume that fake news = disagreement by the person who finds out the fake factor in the news.
A news is fake, means, it has not got verifiable data to back up it's headline or summary.
Simple and plain.
Why is it so hard for some people to understand?
I would rather communicate with those who don't label people and jump to conclusions.
Good day, and Remember,
Fake News = No verifiable data source + no quantifiable data.
Fake News Defender's arguments = oppose all those who find out the fake factor/fact check by abusing them and name calling them trolls "look he disagrees hence he calls it fake news".