Ah, yes, Google are not taken seriously in academia because they are not releasing the code source to their models. Google is usually the largest contributor to most ML conferences (NIPS, ICML, etc.)
Most papers are not about implementation and more about the concepts or proofs. They are rather straightforward to reimplement, and I don't think anybody is accusing them of faking their results.
Most papers are not about implementation and more about the concepts or proofs. They are rather straightforward to reimplement, and I don't think anybody is accusing them of faking their results.