> Closing the public access doesn’t make PaX/Grsecurity a non-free/libre software. Those who purchase subscriptions can access the source code. We don’t see GPL violated in any way here.
I'm not an expert in software licenses, but this seems wrong. Can you really have "free" GPL software that requires a subscription fee?
I'm not an expert in software licenses, but this seems wrong. Can you really have "free" GPL software that requires a subscription fee?