The issue that the Board has is that he claimed to be an engineer in a public forum. The Boards interpretation of "engineer" in this context was to mean Traffic Engineer.
The Board warned Järlström that he was in violation of the Law and asked him to stop claiming to be an engineer, to which he agreed. It was later, when he continued to claim to be an engineer that legal action was taken.
It is also of note, and stated in the Board's documentation of the case, that Sweden has no legal standards for engineers of any kind.
Finally, full disclosure, I am a registered and licensed traffic engineer.
The Board warned Järlström that he was in violation of the Law and asked him to stop claiming to be an engineer, to which he agreed. It was later, when he continued to claim to be an engineer that legal action was taken.
It is also of note, and stated in the Board's documentation of the case, that Sweden has no legal standards for engineers of any kind.
Finally, full disclosure, I am a registered and licensed traffic engineer.
[edit] grammar