The guy surely learned a lot building this, but...
No comparison to jQuery or YUI 3. The documentation suggests jo has a lot of catching up to do.
> If you're using jo to create all the UI for your application, you won't need any content or tags in your index.html file.
Apparently completely ignorant of progressive enhancement: deliver the markup and CSS and then enhance with JavaScript.
> Often, important information that needs to be documented just doesn't fit into a neat, tidy spot.
This is nonsense: you put it in the overall description of the class. But based on this nonsense, jo invents its own, based on markdown. So you get a plain HTML page for each class instead of something similar to javadoc.
No comparison to jQuery or YUI 3. The documentation suggests jo has a lot of catching up to do.
> If you're using jo to create all the UI for your application, you won't need any content or tags in your index.html file.
Apparently completely ignorant of progressive enhancement: deliver the markup and CSS and then enhance with JavaScript.
> Often, important information that needs to be documented just doesn't fit into a neat, tidy spot.
This is nonsense: you put it in the overall description of the class. But based on this nonsense, jo invents its own, based on markdown. So you get a plain HTML page for each class instead of something similar to javadoc.