You clearly also haven't read many of the papers it cites.
I would say one weakness of the book is that parts of it are too much like a survey of the papers in a subfield. Another is that it is very heavy on theory and light on practice (e.g., no exercises.)
I would say one weakness of the book is that parts of it are too much like a survey of the papers in a subfield. Another is that it is very heavy on theory and light on practice (e.g., no exercises.)