> The scheme we propose is built around the variety of concepts of btrfs and Linux file system name-spacing
How many here use Btrfs in production. Facebook does I think. Who else?
Tying something to the filesystem seems a good way to optimize and get a lot of benefit without too much work. But only if that file system is already prevalent.
But I am a bit worried about Btrfs. Is there even a consensus on Btrfs being "the future". There was at some point I think. I've seen https://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/Bcachefs/ touted as the "future" of FS on Linux.
EDIT: Oh 2014. Well it's already 2017 so the question is even more relevant regarding where do we see Btrfs heading?
How many here use Btrfs in production. Facebook does I think. Who else?
Tying something to the filesystem seems a good way to optimize and get a lot of benefit without too much work. But only if that file system is already prevalent.
But I am a bit worried about Btrfs. Is there even a consensus on Btrfs being "the future". There was at some point I think. I've seen https://bcache.evilpiepirate.org/Bcachefs/ touted as the "future" of FS on Linux.
EDIT: Oh 2014. Well it's already 2017 so the question is even more relevant regarding where do we see Btrfs heading?