Would it be sexist if the women on the team were offered either the men's jacket, or an opportunity to purchase the women's jacket at a cost equal to the difference in cost between the two (i.e. Uber pays the same in both cases, but the women have to add a bit)?
Would it be acceptable to only be offered one of the two options, or would each woman have to be allowed to choose for themselves?
These questions also implicitly ask whether Uber should be considered to have given the men "a jacket", or "a value equal to the jacket".
Would it be sexist if the women on the team were offered either the men's jacket, or an opportunity to purchase the women's jacket at a cost equal to the difference in cost between the two (i.e. Uber pays the same in both cases, but the women have to add a bit)?
Would it be acceptable to only be offered one of the two options, or would each woman have to be allowed to choose for themselves?
These questions also implicitly ask whether Uber should be considered to have given the men "a jacket", or "a value equal to the jacket".