I don't understand the use of the 1st amendment in this case, which is about free speech, but Amazon is trying to avoid giving data to the gov which would fall under the 4th and 5th amendments. Does anyone understand their reasoning for this approach?
I would also like to add, And I said the same thing about Apple, this feels like public relations via the courtroom more than a genuine desire to protect data from the gov. Don't forget Jeff Bezos's CIA connections!
I would also like to add, And I said the same thing about Apple, this feels like public relations via the courtroom more than a genuine desire to protect data from the gov. Don't forget Jeff Bezos's CIA connections!