I am having a hard time understanding the paper. Would one of you be able to summarize the implications of the paper?
I found this part interesting:
"I advance the hypothesis here that technical change in general can be ascribed to experience, that it is the very activity of production which gives rise to problems for which favorable responses are selected over time."
I found this part interesting: "I advance the hypothesis here that technical change in general can be ascribed to experience, that it is the very activity of production which gives rise to problems for which favorable responses are selected over time."