The title is very misleading. I was expecting a discussion about the future of programming, why there will probably never be a "best" language or why we're not all using functional languages yet. Was disappointed after reading the first sentence:
> Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort.
The article states that these tips are 'usually universal', but I hardly found that to be true, only having counted about 10 points not being about C++.
The title should probably be something like the obvious "42 tips for C++ programmers" as the current one really doesn't justify the content.
> Yes, you've guessed correctly - the answer is "42". In this article you will find 42 recommendations about coding in C++ that can help a programmer avoid a lot of errors, save time and effort.
The article states that these tips are 'usually universal', but I hardly found that to be true, only having counted about 10 points not being about C++.
The title should probably be something like the obvious "42 tips for C++ programmers" as the current one really doesn't justify the content.