Headline: "McDonalds refuses to hire blacks for being inferior".
Reality: A racist shift store manager of a single store owned by an absentee franchiser is caught discriminating in his hiring practices and promptly fired.
Is the headline misleading? It's a factual statement that a McDonalds in the context described above did do exactly what they were accused of.
So back on point, yes it was a Muslim ban and no it wasn't a ban on Muslims. Both sides are trying to frame it for maximum affect and the result is we grow further divided as a people.
Headline: "McDonalds refuses to hire blacks for being inferior".
Reality: A racist shift store manager of a single store owned by an absentee franchiser is caught discriminating in his hiring practices and promptly fired.
Is the headline misleading? It's a factual statement that a McDonalds in the context described above did do exactly what they were accused of.
So back on point, yes it was a Muslim ban and no it wasn't a ban on Muslims. Both sides are trying to frame it for maximum affect and the result is we grow further divided as a people.