>You'd prefer people being thrown in prison for refusing to surrender their private property rights
Yes, I'd prefer people be thrown in prison for refusing to feed the starving, rather than people starving to death.
I think property rights are valuable in-as-far as they improve overall utility, but insisting on enforcing them to the point where it could cause people serious harm is clearly beyond that point.
We can argue about the extents of property rights, but suggesting there be no limits is arguing for legalised economic murder.
EDIT: Just to note that I edited this quite extensively after posting.
Yes, I'd prefer people be thrown in prison for refusing to feed the starving, rather than people starving to death.
I think property rights are valuable in-as-far as they improve overall utility, but insisting on enforcing them to the point where it could cause people serious harm is clearly beyond that point.
We can argue about the extents of property rights, but suggesting there be no limits is arguing for legalised economic murder.
EDIT: Just to note that I edited this quite extensively after posting.