>However, there has been some misunderstanding about how AMP works. One widely circulated blog post written back in October claimed Google was stealing traffic from publishers via its AMP pages.
I am really happy to see this change, as the author of said blog post :)
> But that wasn’t true. Google does display the AMP URL in the search results, which serves up the page content from Google’s cache, but the traffic remains the publisher’s, and the content is served from the publisher’s site.
So which one is it? Does it server content from Google cache or from publisher's site ;)
I am really happy to see this change, as the author of said blog post :)
> But that wasn’t true. Google does display the AMP URL in the search results, which serves up the page content from Google’s cache, but the traffic remains the publisher’s, and the content is served from the publisher’s site.
So which one is it? Does it server content from Google cache or from publisher's site ;)
Link to the original blog post: https://www.alexkras.com/google-may-be-stealing-your-mobile-...