When he claimed that the properties P or Q are of each of the set of A, B, C, D, E, you claim that I can't conclude that he said that P or Q are the properties of A?
I used A has property P, substitute A has property Q, it's still wrong claim of him, for the very same reasons:
Python has a huge user base, if he can improve it in any of his points (I just selected one) and keep it working for the user base, please. I know he won't be able, his talk is of ignorance and provocation.
And these who develop aren't stupid or doing politics, they keep the Python working for their base, improving it as much as they can.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13485784
I used A has property P, substitute A has property Q, it's still wrong claim of him, for the very same reasons:
Python has a huge user base, if he can improve it in any of his points (I just selected one) and keep it working for the user base, please. I know he won't be able, his talk is of ignorance and provocation.
And these who develop aren't stupid or doing politics, they keep the Python working for their base, improving it as much as they can.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13485784