I never considered it harsh. If anything, it should be a testament to how nice Python is -- if I /didn't/ like it, I would have a much, much longer list of complaints!
People seem to be missing that sentiment -- I do love Python and use it almost daily. This is merely a list of thorns I run into frequently.
>Regarding the FP comments, since it lacks TCO, my take away has always been that Python can only ever become a quasi-functional language. Its hard to be more than that in its current state.
I mean, it could always encourage playing with functions more -- and importantly, providing an stdlib that encourages that.
>These questions made me want to ask you - what languages do you think are better in comparison?
That is a somewhat loaded question: my counter question would be, "In what regards?"
I cannot say a certain language is better than Python in every or most circumstances, but I can in regards to specific points/features, if you'd like to elaborate.
People seem to be missing that sentiment -- I do love Python and use it almost daily. This is merely a list of thorns I run into frequently.
>Regarding the FP comments, since it lacks TCO, my take away has always been that Python can only ever become a quasi-functional language. Its hard to be more than that in its current state.
I mean, it could always encourage playing with functions more -- and importantly, providing an stdlib that encourages that.
>These questions made me want to ask you - what languages do you think are better in comparison?
That is a somewhat loaded question: my counter question would be, "In what regards?"
I cannot say a certain language is better than Python in every or most circumstances, but I can in regards to specific points/features, if you'd like to elaborate.