> I never said it was slow because they were incompetent
Your own article appears to have exactly that claim:
> These are obvious flaws in design, in my opinion, that warrant re-looking at, but to which no real improvements are being made for some reason. (Incompetence? Politics? Both? Who knows.)
> Without further ado: The standard interpreter bring rather slow; PyPy is nice, but its Python 3 support is very immature.
Your own article appears to have exactly that claim:
> These are obvious flaws in design, in my opinion, that warrant re-looking at, but to which no real improvements are being made for some reason. (Incompetence? Politics? Both? Who knows.)
> Without further ado: The standard interpreter bring rather slow; PyPy is nice, but its Python 3 support is very immature.