An argument from personal incredulity is still a logical fallacy. It's easy to see why this line of reasoning doesn't make sense.
If we're living in a simulation the thing most likely to running the simulation is ourselves, in the future.
It's easy to see why that would be valuable, e.g. this could be a simulation to see what happens if a war broke out in 1914, and all the downstream effects on that happening.
If we're living in a simulation the thing most likely to running the simulation is ourselves, in the future.
It's easy to see why that would be valuable, e.g. this could be a simulation to see what happens if a war broke out in 1914, and all the downstream effects on that happening.