Isn't the whole reason we punish people for murder based on the idea that if the murderer had chosen not to murder (in other words, if they had taken the other route at the fork in the road) then the victim would still be alive?
Obviously, murdering an already alive person is not the same thing as not having children, but is not the reasoning the same? Am I missing something?
Obviously, murdering an already alive person is not the same thing as not having children, but is not the reasoning the same? Am I missing something?