The devs are somewhat hostile in this case. It's a matter of introducing the feature to help out mitigate other requests to take down information. They have the entire user base of github as "inactive users" so they might get more requests.
But, the fact that the first comment from the dev came out sort of hostile is the major concern.
That's why the attention is brought to the community to decide which argument is right.
It's not pushing for action... it's deciding if/who is at fault and whether gitpay should have been doing this sort of thing in the first place.
But, the fact that the first comment from the dev came out sort of hostile is the major concern.
That's why the attention is brought to the community to decide which argument is right.
It's not pushing for action... it's deciding if/who is at fault and whether gitpay should have been doing this sort of thing in the first place.
It's a question of ethics in the bigger picture.