> They would simply censor access to all the XMPP providers
First we already know this situation with email, and we see that as a federate protocol email is not censorable. At least not as easy to censor as Signal is.
Secondly it's not possible because their is not a finish list of providers. By the way 1) everybody should-could be its own provider 2) everybody must use its own domain name DNS to make addresses like greeting@name.
First we already know this situation with email, and we see that as a federate protocol email is not censorable. At least not as easy to censor as Signal is.
Secondly it's not possible because their is not a finish list of providers. By the way 1) everybody should-could be its own provider 2) everybody must use its own domain name DNS to make addresses like greeting@name.
Solution for 1) https://yunohost.org & https://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox & http://modoboa.org/en
2) for this point see https://account.conversations.im/domain AND if the DNS is to centralize lets see for GnuNameSystem https://gnunet.org/gns for the address like greaing@name see https://linuxfr.org/users/apichat/journaux/salut-toto-saluta...