Comment Comment by gregmac One of the things that I really dislike about homebrew is its refusal to run via sudo plus the requirement that you own /usr/local.This means:1) It is a security hole; any application can now modify system-wide applications at any time.2) You can't have multiple users able to use homebrew.I was expecting homebrew to be something similar to apt/yum/etc, but this makes it pretty fundamentally different.How does Macports handle this? Does $USER still need write access to /opt? parent gregmac 10 years ago
This means:
1) It is a security hole; any application can now modify system-wide applications at any time.
2) You can't have multiple users able to use homebrew.
I was expecting homebrew to be something similar to apt/yum/etc, but this makes it pretty fundamentally different.
How does Macports handle this? Does $USER still need write access to /opt?