Comment Comment by mysterypie You're making these two points:(#1) Apple was doing something distinctive.(#2) Nasty Gal is not doing something distinctive and needs millions of dollars just to be noticed.On that basis alone, something like #1 is a much better investment than something like #2. parent mysterypie 10 years ago
(#1) Apple was doing something distinctive.
(#2) Nasty Gal is not doing something distinctive and needs millions of dollars just to be noticed.
On that basis alone, something like #1 is a much better investment than something like #2.